Racial and Ethnic Categories in Biomedical Research: There is no Baby in the Bathwater

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):497-499 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of racial categories in biomedicine has had a long history in the United States. However, social hierarchy and discrimination, justified by purported scientific differences, has also plagued the history of racial categories. Because “race” has some correlation with biological and genetic characteristics, there has been a call not to “throw the baby out with the bathwater” by eliminating race as a research or clinical category. I argue that race is too undefined and fluid to be useful as a proxy for biology or genetics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Debating the Use of Racial and Ethnic Categories in Research.Susan M. Wolf - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):483-486.
Traditional Catholic philosophy: baby and bathwater.James Franklin - 2006 - In Michael Whelan (ed.), Issues for Church and Society in Australia. Sydney, Australia: St Pauls. pp. 15-32.
The problem of race in medicine.Michael Root - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):20-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
53 (#299,829)

6 months
17 (#146,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1898 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.

Add more references