Mill on Bentham and Coleridge

Westport, Conn.: Greenwood. Edited by F. R. Leavis (1950)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Even if [Bentham and Coleridge] had had no great influence they would still have been the classical examples they are of two great opposing types of mind. . . . And as we follow Mill's analysis, exposition and evaluation of this pair of opposites we are at the same time, we realize, forming a close acquaintance with a mind different from either. From the introduction

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#560,541)

6 months
8 (#347,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How economists got it wrong: A nuanced account.David Colander - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (1-2):1-27.
Children under Liberal Theory.Susan M. Turner - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (4):717-730.
Philosophical Autobiography: St Augustine and John Stuart Mill.Martin Warner - 1983 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 16:189-210.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references