Dwelling in No-Place: Our Ethical Between

Environmental Ethics 28 (4):413-428 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suggestions made by Luce Irigaray in her book, An Ethics of Sexual Difference, may offer a solution to a problem in environmental ethics which has much in common with the gender problem: the tendency of the masculine to exploit the Other as “a-place-to-be-in.” If humans are to achieve the ethicality of mutually beneficial, sustainable relating with all beings, we need to initiate an economy of desire which has regard to a reciprocity of receptivity-activity, as a way of safeguarding a clear space open to the kind of relating that makes possible a “permanent becoming” together of all beings. We need to live in a psychic No-Place, to experience our environment as the potentially infinite “Open” of “our-between.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dwelling in No-Place.Ian Mills - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (4):413-428.
Feet Forbidden Here.Kip Redick - 2009 - Environment, Space, Place 1 (2):7-26.
Curriculum Making as the Enactment of Dwelling in Places.Hamish Ross & Greg Mannion - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (3):303-313.
The Art of Sailing.Phillip J. Nelson - 2012 - Environment, Space, Place 4 (1):79-105.
Environmental Values.Bryan G. Norton & Bruce Hannon - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (3):227-245.
Environmental Values.Bruce Hannon - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (3):227-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
6 (#1,465,900)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references