A Bayesian Defence of Popperian Science?

Analysis 55 (3):213 - 215 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/55.3.213

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does this sentence have no truthmaker?Dan López de Sa & Elia Zardini - 2006 - Analysis 66 (2):154–157.
II—Peter Milne: What is the Normative Role of Logic?Peter Milne - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):269-298.
The Requirement of Total Evidence: A Reply to Epstein’s Critique.Martin Barrett & Elliott Sober - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (1):191-203.
Review of Peter Urbach and Colin Howson: Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. [REVIEW]Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
Review. Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. Colin Howson, Peter Urbach.Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
Truthmaker maximalism defended.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2006 - Analysis 66 (3):260–264.
Book Review: Phil Hutchinson, Rupert Read, and Wes Sharrock: There is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Farnham, UK: Ashgate Press, 2008. 156 pp. £50.00 (hardcover). [REVIEW]Patrick J. J. Phillips - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):295-297.
In defence of an argument against truthmaker maximalism.Jerzy Gołosz - 2014 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 24 (1):105-109.
Testing, Rationality, and Progress: Essays on the Popperian Tradition in Economic Methodology.D. Wade Hands - 1993 - Roman & Littlefield.
There is no such thing as social science: In defence of Peter Winch – by Phil Hutchinson, Rupert read and Wes Sharrock.Carolyn Wilde - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (2):191-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
93 (#181,265)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Milne
University of Stirling

Citations of this work

Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support.Ellery Eells & Branden Fitelson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):129 - 142.
Resurrecting logical probability.James Franklin - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (2):277-305.
Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson.Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson, Stephan Hartmann & Josh Snyder - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):539-563.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references