Correction to: Maximal possessiveness: A serious flaw in the evil God challenge

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 92 (2):89-89 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maximal possessiveness: A serious flaw in the evil God challenge.Rad Miksa - 2022 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 92 (2):73-88.
A Thomistic Answer to the Evil‐God Challenge.B. Kyle Keltz - 2019 - Heythrop Journal 60 (5):689-698.
Meeting the Evil God Challenge.Ben Page & Max Baker-Hytch - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):489-514.
Making whole: The ethics of correction.Michael Bugeja - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (1):49 – 65.
Moral motivation and the evil-god challenge.Luke Wilson - 2021 - Religious Studies 57 (4):703-716.
Sceptical theism and the evil-god challenge.Perry Hendricks - 2018 - Religious Studies 54 (4):549-561.
The evil-god challenge.Stephen Law - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (3):353 - 373.
Divine Goodness and the Problem of Evil.Terence Penelhum - 1966 - Religious Studies 2 (1):95 - 107.
${\Cal d}$-maximal sets.Peter A. Cholak, Peter Gerdes & Karen Lange - 2015 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 80 (4):1182-1210.
-Maximal sets.Peter A. Cholak, Peter Gerdes & Karen Lange - 2015 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 80 (4):1182-1210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-29

Downloads
15 (#941,877)

6 months
2 (#1,185,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rad Miksa
Independent Researcher

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references