Abstract
Purpose This conceptual contribution is based on the observation that digital inequalities literature has not sufficiently considered digital footprints as an important social differentiator. The purpose of the paper is to inspire current digital inequality frameworks to include this new dimension. Design/methodology/approach Literature on digital inequalities is combined with research on privacy, big data and algorithms. The focus on current findings from an interdisciplinary point of view allows for a synthesis of different perspectives and conceptual development of digital footprints as a new dimension of digital inequality. Findings Digital footprints originate from active content creation, passive participation and platform-generated data. The literature review shows how different social groups may experience systematic advantages or disadvantages based on their digital footprints. A special emphasis should be on those at the margins, for example, users of low socioeconomic background. Originality/value By combining largely independent research fields, the contribution opens new avenues for studying digital inequalities, including innovative methodologies to do so.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1108/jices-02-2018-0014
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Doxing: A Conceptual Analysis.David M. Douglas - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (3):199-210.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cultura y contracultura digital: un ensayo.Jorge Portilla - 2011 - Apuntes Filosóficos 20 (39).
Circles: Networks of Reading.Massimo Lollini - 2015 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 4 (1):1-34.
Facing the Digital Partner.Nicola Liberati - 2018 - Glimpse 19:99-107.
How Do We Need Universities in a Technological World?Viorel Guliciuc - 2009 - Dialogue and Universalism 19 (1-2):95-100.
The Digital Phenotype: A Philosophical and Ethical Exploration.Michele Loi - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):155-171.
Representation in Digital Systems.Vincent C. Müller - 2008 - In Adam Briggle, Katinka Waelbers & Brey Philip (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy. IOS Press. pp. 116-121.
Digital Hermeneutics: An Outline. [REVIEW]Rafael Capurro - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (1):35-42.
Code, Nintendo’s Super Mario and Digital Legality.Ashley Pearson & Kieran Tranter - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (4):825-842.
Comment on Norm Friesen's.Estrid Sørensen - 2011 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (3):206-208.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-22

Total views
19 ( #579,424 of 2,499,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes