AI and Society 35 (1):73-86 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
Today, there is an emerging interest for the potential role of hermeneutics in reflecting on the practices related to digital technologies and their consequences. Nonetheless, such an interest has neither given rise to a unitary approach nor to a shared debate. The primary goal of this paper is to map and synthetize the different existing perspectives to pave the way for an open discussion on the topic. The article is developed in two steps. In the first section, the authors analyze digital hermeneutics “in theory” by confronting and systematizing the existing literature. In particular, they stress three main distinctions among the approaches: between “methodological” and “ontological” digital hermeneutics; between data- and text-oriented digital hermeneutics; and between “quantitative” and “qualitative” credos in digital hermeneutics. In the second section, they consider digital hermeneutics “in action”, by critically analyzing the uses of digital data for studying a classical object such as the political opinion. In the conclusion, we will pave the way to an ontological turn in digital hermeneutics. Most of this article is devoted to the methodological issue of interpreting with digital machines. The main task of an ontological digital hermeneutics would consist instead in wondering if it is legitimate, and eventually to which extent, to speak of digital technologies, or at least of some of them, as interpretational machines.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s00146-018-0856-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Digital Hermeneutics: An Outline. [REVIEW]Rafael Capurro - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (1):35-42.
Do Animals Have Technologies?Galit Wellner - 2017 - Studia Phaenomenologica 17:265-282.
Cultura y contracultura digital: un ensayo.Jorge Portilla - 2011 - Apuntes Filosóficos 20 (39).
Analog and Digital Representation.Matthew Katz - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (3):403-408.
Circles: Networks of Reading.Massimo Lollini - 2015 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 4 (1):1-34.
The Digital Phenotype: A Philosophical and Ethical Exploration.Michele Loi - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):155-171.
Qualities of Sharing and Their Transformations in the Digital Age.Andreas Wittel - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 15 (9):2011.
How Do We Need Universities in a Technological World?Viorel Guliciuc - 2009 - Dialogue and Universalism 19 (1-2):95-100.
Varieties of Analog and Digital Representation.Whit Schonbein - 2014 - Minds and Machines 24 (4):415-438.
The Digital Humanities as a Humanities Project.Patrik Svensson - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (1-2):425-60.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-01

Total views
34 ( #337,367 of 2,519,622 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,622 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes