There is a difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):510-512 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If genetic diagnosis and preimplantation selection could be employed to produce deaf children, would it be acceptable for deaf parents to do so? Some say no, because there is no moral difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child, and because it would be wrong to deafen infants. It is argued in this paper, however, that this view is untenable. There are differences between the two activities, and it is perfectly possible to condone genetic selection for deafness while condemning attempts to deafen infants at birth

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selecting for deafness – a marvellous opportunity or imposed dependence?Radim Bělohrad - 2023 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 13 (1-2):15-27.
Psychological Development of Deaf Children.Marc Marschark - 1993 - Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
84 (#205,483)

6 months
22 (#128,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Justice and the Possibility of Good Moralism in Bioethics.Matti Häyry - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (2):236-263.
Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability?Mark Greene & Steven Augello - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.
Theories or No Theories—Is Anything Evolving?Matti Häyry & Tuija Takala - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (2):151-157.
Synthesizing Methuselah: The Question of Artificial Agelessness.Richard B. Gibson - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (1):60-75.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations