The Fragmentation of Felt Time

Philosophers' Imprint 22 (1) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why does time seem to fly by when we are absorbed? The case of listening to music is of particular interest, given that listening to music itself requires experiencing time. In this paper, I argue that neither the prevailing psychological model nor some initially appealing alternative explanations can account for the experience of time flying by in cases where, like listening to music, the activity we are absorbed in itself requires experiencing time. I then put forward a novel view on which the fragmentation of felt time is what best explains these cases. More specifically, I develop a view on which attentive engagement fragments felt time such that we experience the activity we are engaged in as if it is located in a temporally isolated branch or fragment of the main timeline. Time then seems to pass only in this branch, creating the sensation — upon integration — that less time has passed in the main timeline. In support of this proposal, I draw upon ideas in the empirical literature, and I suggest some underlying neuropsychological mechanisms that might serve to implement the model. I then extend the fragmentation model to cases where thinking about time makes it feel as though more of it passes. I end the paper by examining the possibility that an analogous model holds for the case of space.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Susanne Langer on Music and Time.Eran Guter & Inbal Guter - 2021 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 58 (1):35-56.
A Quantum Theory of Felt Duration.Carla Merino-Rajme - 2014 - Analytic Philosophy 55 (3):239-275.
A Critique of Susanne Langer’s View of Musical Temporality.Eran Guter & Inbal Guter - 2018 - Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, Vol. 10.
Art, temporality and "motions of the mind".Venkat Ramanan - 2020 - Https://Bluelabyrinths.Com/.
Time, Space and Reality.Peter Green - 1934 - Philosophy 9 (36):461-.
Fragmentation and Old Evidence.Will Fleisher - 2023 - Episteme 20 (3):542-567.
The problematic of fragmentation [Special issue].S. C. Yanchar & B. D. Slife - 2000 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (3):235-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
48 (#330,639)

6 months
12 (#211,554)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carla Merino-Rajme
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing.John Gibbon - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (3):279-325.
Mental imagery and the varieties of amodal perception.Robert Eamon Briscoe - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):153-173.
Segmentation in the perception and memory of events.J. M. Zacks & C. A. Kurby - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):72-79.

View all 15 references / Add more references