- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Did we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons
BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):69 (2014)
Abstract
The systematic review of reasons is a new way to obtain comprehensive information about specific ethical topics. One such review was carried out for the question of why post-trial access to trial drugs should or need not be provided. The objective of this study was to empirically validate this review using an author check method. The article also reports on methodological challenges faced by our studyOther Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reasons Why Post-Trial Access to Trial Drugs Should, or Need not be Ensured to Research Participants: A Systematic Review.N. Sofaer & D. Strech - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):160-184.
The need for systematic reviews of reasons.Neema Sofaer & Daniel Strech - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (6):315-328.
Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review.Marcel Mertz, Hélène Nobile & Hannes Kahrass - 2020 - Nursing Ethics 27 (4):960-978.
Incorporating Ethically Relevant Empirical Data From Systematic Review of Reasons: A Case Study of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy.Robert Torrance, Chang-Ho Yoon, Andrew B. Torrance & Robert C. Tasker - 2020 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (2):91-103.
A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies.Rachel Davies, Jonathan Ives & Michael Dunn - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):15.
Challenges with participant reimbursement: experiences from a post-trial access study.Kathryn Therese Mngadi, Janet Frohlich, Carl Montague, Jerome Singh, Nelisiwe Nkomonde, Nomzamo Mvandaba, Fanelesibonge Ntombeka, Londiwe Luthuli, Quarraisha Abdool Karim & Leila Mansoor - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (11):909-913.
A systematic review of patient access to medical records in the acute setting: practicalities, perspectives and ethical consequences.Zoë Fritz, Isla L. Kuhn & Stephanie N. D’Costa - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-19.
The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia research: findings of a systematic qualitative review.Tim G. Götzelmann, Daniel Strech & Hannes Kahrass - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-11.
Mind the gap: An empirical study of post‐trial access in HIV biomedical prevention trials.Bridget Haire & Christopher Jordens - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 15 (2):85-97.
Attitudes toward Post‐Trial Access to Medical Interventions: A Review of Academic Literature, Legislation, and International Guidelines. [REVIEW]Kori Cook, Jeremy Snyder & John Calvert - 2015 - Developing World Bioethics 16 (2):70-79.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-09-28
Downloads
43 (#405,344)
6 months
13 (#382,130)
2014-09-28
Downloads
43 (#405,344)
6 months
13 (#382,130)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.Eric Racine, M. Ariel Cascio, Marjorie Montreuil & Aline Bogossian - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (4):253-278.
References found in this work
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.Guy Widdershoven, Tineke Abma & Bert Molewijk - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (4):236-248.
How to write a systematic review of reasons.Daniel Strech & Neema Sofaer - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):121-126.
Reasons Why Post-Trial Access to Trial Drugs Should, or Need not be Ensured to Research Participants: A Systematic Review.N. Sofaer & D. Strech - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):160-184.
Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: The example of concealed medications.Laurence B. McCullough, John H. Coverdale & Frank A. Chervenak - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (1):65 – 76.
Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics.D. Strech, M. Synofzik & G. Marckmann - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):472-477.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b65f85844-kqm7s uwo