Oregon's Denial

Hastings Center Report 22 (6):21-25 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In using quality of life as a guide to rationing health services, Oregon laid itself open to charges of bias against the disabled—charges that cannot be dismissed out of hand.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
13 (#1,065,206)

6 months
5 (#711,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Disability: An Agenda for Bioethics.Mark G. Kuczewski - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):36-44.
Cost-Effectiveness and Disability Discrimination.Dan W. Brock - 2009 - Economics and Philosophy 25 (1):27-47.
Disability Discrimination and Patient-Sensitive Health-Related Quality of Life.Lasse Nielsen - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (2):142-153.
Oregon's experiment.Michael Brannigan - 1993 - Health Care Analysis 1 (1):15-32.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references