- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Role and Potential of Stakeholders in “Hollow Participation”: Conventional Stakeholder Theory and Institutionalist Alternatives
Business and Society Review 108 (2):183-202 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Role and Potential of Stakeholders in “Hollow Participation”: Conventional Stakeholder Theory and Institutionalist Alternatives.Geoffrey Wood Kamel Mellahi - 2003 - Business and Society Review 108 (2):183-202.
Mediation as an ethical adjunct of stakeholder theory.Marc Lampe - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):165 - 173.
An Organizational Field Approach to Corporate Rationality: The Role of Stakeholder Activism.Lenahan L. O’Connell, Carroll U. Stephens, Michael Betz, Jon M. Shepard & Jamie R. Hendry - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):93-111.
An Organizational Field Approach to Corporate Rationality: The Role of Stakeholder Activism.Jamie R. Hendry - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):93-111.
Structure and Agency in Firm-Stakeholder Networks.Dominic Kaeslin - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:443-447.
Reconstructing the Moral Logic of the Stakeholder Approach, and Reconsidering the Participation Requirement.Marc A. Cohen - 2023 - Philosophy of Management 22 (2):293-308.
What We Talk About When We Talk About Stakeholders.Heather Elms, Shawn L. Berman, Hussein Fadlallah, Robert A. Phillips & Michael E. Johnson-Cramer - 2022 - Business and Society 61 (5):1083-1135.
Who are the Stakeholders Now? An Empirical Examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood Theory of Stakeholder Salience.Vanessa Magness - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):177-192.
Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory.Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137-148.
The Effects of Attribution Style and Stakeholder Role on Blame for the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.Paul E. Spector, Mark J. Martinko, Brandon Randolph-Seng, Kevin T. Mahoney & Stacey R. Kessler - 2019 - Business and Society 58 (8):1572-1598.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-01
Downloads
24 (#679,414)
6 months
9 (#355,374)
2013-11-01
Downloads
24 (#679,414)
6 months
9 (#355,374)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reclaiming Marginalized Stakeholders.Robbin Derry - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):253-264.
Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations.Reinhard Steurer, Markus E. Langer, Astrid Konrad & André Martinuzzi - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 61 (3):263-281.
Corporate Social Responsibility, Utilitarianism, and the Capabilities Approach.Cecile Renouard - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):85 - 97.
“Society is Out There, Organisation is in Here”: On the Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Held by Different Managerial Groups.James A. H. S. Hine & Lutz Preuss - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):381-393.
Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link.Isaiah Yeshayahu Marom - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):191-200.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-tsllw uwo