Perché non possiamo pensare qualsiasi cosa (ma possiamo pensarne tante). La religione come studio di caso

Rivista di Estetica 42:55-70 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present essays tries to point out limits and constraints on our thought faculty. To this purpose it tackles, on the one hand, evolutionary psychology, and on the other massive modularity, construed as both consistent with evolutionary psychology and experimentally supported. We apply the results to an analysis of the development and epidemiology of religious belief.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Il paradosso del terrore.Carola Barbero - 2008 - Rivista di Estetica 39:43-55.
Tante ignoranze, non solo sante.Mario Perniola - 2010 - Ágalma: Rivista di studi culturali e di estetica 19.
Che cosa sono gli Studio Crafts?Sarah Maclaren - 2007 - Ágalma: Rivista di studi culturali e di estetica 13.
Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis.Richard Samuels - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):575-602.
Premessa: Ma io perché venirvi?Angì Perniola - 2021 - Ágalma: Rivista di studi culturali e di estetica 42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-26

Downloads
15 (#948,985)

6 months
7 (#592,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references