Iterative voting and acyclic games

, , &
Artificial Intelligence 252 (C):100-122 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.artint.2017.08.002

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A classification of weakly acyclic games.Krzysztof R. Apt & Sunil Simon - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (4):501-524.
Bribes, power, and managerial control in corporate voting games.Robert A. Jarrow & J. Chris Leach - 1989 - Theory and Decision 26 (3):235-251.
The potential of iterative voting to solve the separability problem in referendum elections.Clark Bowman, Jonathan K. Hodge & Ada Yu - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (1):111-124.
Mathematical structures of simple voting games.Moshé Machover & Simon D. Terrington - unknown
The Tragedy of the Commons as a Voting Game.Luc Bovens - 2015 - In Martin Peterson (ed.), The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Classic philosophical arguments. Cambridge University Press. pp. 156-176.
Achievable Hierarchies In Voting Games.Jane Friedman, Lynn Mcgrath & Cameron Parker - 2006 - Theory and Decision 61 (4):305-318.
A note on the ordinal equivalence of power indices in games with coalition structure.Sébastien Courtin & Bertrand Tchantcho - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (4):617-628.
L.S. Penrose's limit theorem : proof of some special cases.Ines Lindner & Moshé Machover - unknown
Potential and 'Power of a Collectivity to Act'.Annick Laruelle & Federico Valenciano - 2005 - Theory and Decision 58 (2):187-194.
A Special Case of Penrose’s Limit Theorem When Abstention is Allowed.Ines Lindner - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (4):495-518.
Power distribution in the Basque Parliament using games with externalities.G. Arévalo-Iglesias & M. Álvarez-Mozos - 2020 - Theory and Decision 89 (2):157-178.
Groups can make a difference: voting power measures extended. [REVIEW]Claus Beisbart - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (3):469-488.
Extended semantics and inference for the Independent Choice Logic.Fabrizio Riguzzi - 2009 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 17 (6):589-629.
Meaningful learning in weighted voting games: an experiment.Eric Guerci, Nobuyuki Hanaki & Naoki Watanabe - 2017 - Theory and Decision 83 (1):131-153.
Monotonicity of power in games with a priori unions.J. M. Alonso-Meijide, C. Bowles, M. J. Holler & S. Napel - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (1):17-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
4 (#1,617,803)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sincerity and manipulation under approval voting.Ulle Endriss - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):335-355.

Add more references