The potential of iterative voting to solve the separability problem in referendum elections

Theory and Decision 77 (1):111-124 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In referendum elections, voters are often required to register simultaneous votes on multiple proposals. The separability problem occurs when a voter’s preferred outcome on one proposal depends on the outcomes of other proposals. This type of interdependence can lead to unsatisfactory or even paradoxical election outcomes, such as a winning outcome that is the last choice of every voter. Here we propose an iterative voting scheme that allows voters to revise their voting strategies based on the outcomes of previous iterations. Using a robust computer simulation, we investigate the potential of this approach to solve the separability problem

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,515

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strategic Voting Under Uncertainty About the Voting Method.Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:252–272.
Stable Voting.Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit - forthcoming - Constitutional Political Economy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
56 (#308,761)

6 months
14 (#356,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ada Yu
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anscombe's paradox and the rule of three-fourths.Carl Wagner - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (3):303-308.
Avoiding Anscombe's paradox.Carl Wagner - 1984 - Theory and Decision 16 (3):233-238.

Add more references