Assigning Functions to Medical Technologies

Philosophy and Technology 30 (3):321-338 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern health care relies extensively on the use of technologies for assessing and treating patients, so it is important to be certain that health care technologies perform their professed functions in an effective and safe manner. Philosophers of technology have developed methods to assign and evaluate the functions of technological products, the major elements of which are described in the ICE theory. This paper questions whether the standard of evidence advocated by the ICE theory is adequate for ascribing and assessing technologies employed in health care. The paper proposes that the general problem with the standard of evidence embodied in the ICE theory is too permissive for assessing medical technologies, in that it does not take into account the relative benefit and harm of medical technologies in ensuring safe functional performance in patients. The paper illustrates how evidence-based medicine has demonstrated the value of clinical research methods, including observational studies, randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, and formal techniques, such as meta-analysis, to measure therapeutic effectiveness. I argue, therefore, that evidence from clinical research studies should take precedence over the testimonial evidence and other types of non-clinical evidence, in providing justification for health technologies.

Similar books and articles

Ethics in health care and medical technologies.Carol Taylor - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (2).
Emerging medical technologies and emerging conceptions of health.William E. Stempsey - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):227-243.
Instrumental colonisation in modern medicine.Ståle Fredriksen - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):287-296.
Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine.R. E. Ashcroft - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):131-135.
Innovation Promises and Evidence Realities.Karen J. Maschke - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (5):inside front cover-inside front.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-15

Downloads
380 (#55,037)

6 months
78 (#65,611)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Against ‘instantaneous’ expertise.Alexander Mebius - 2022 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 17 (1):1-6.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The philosophy of evidence-based medicine.Jeremy H. Howick - 2011 - Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, BMJ Books.
What evidence in evidence-based medicine?John Worrall - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S316-S330.
What Evidence in Evidence‐Based Medicine?John Worrall - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S316-S330.

View all 20 references / Add more references