Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (5):543-564 (2014)

Authors
Darian Meacham
Maastricht University
Abstract
The debate over the ethics of radically, technologically altering the capacities and traditional form of the human body is rife with appeals to and dismissals of the importance of the integrity of the human species. Species-integrist arguments can be found in authors as varied as Annas, Fukuyama, Habermas, and Agar. However, the ethical salience of species integrity is widely contested by authors such as Buchanan, Daniels, Fenton, and Juengst. This article proposes a Phenomenological approach to the question of species-integrity, arguing in favor of a phenomenon of species-recognition that carries an ethical pull. Building on Husserl’s Phenomenological account of empathy and the lived-body, as well as Schopenhauer’s concept of compassion as an ethical urphenomenon, I develop a “Phenomenological species concept” , which I argue has the ethical significance that biological species concepts do not. The PSC reorients the debate over human alteration and species integrity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhu030
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism.Ingo Brigandt - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305–1316.
The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem.Mark Ridley - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
Are Biological Species Real?Hugh Lehman - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):157-167.
What is a Species, and What is Not?Ernst Mayr - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (2):262-277.
Cento e quarenta anons sem Charles Darwin bastam: sobre variedades, espécies, e definições.Ricardo Wainzbort - 2000 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 4 (1):141-184.
Species Concepts Should Not Conflict with Evolutionary History, but Often Do.Joel D. Velasco - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (4):407-414.
Species Concepts and Species Delimitation.Kevin de Quieroz - 2007 - Systematic Biology 56 (6):879-886.
How is a Species Kept Together?Peter J. Beurton - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (2):181-196.
Evolution Without Species: The Case of Mosaic Bacteriophages.Gregory J. Morgan & W. Brad Pitts - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):745-765.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-09-15

Total views
29 ( #397,105 of 2,520,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,438 of 2,520,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes