Response to Spriggs: Is conceiving a child to benefit another against the interest of the new child?

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):343-343 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis—the risks are unknown and human dignity could be compromisedMerle Spriggs argues that there are no good reasons to prevent a couple utilising preimplantation genetic diagnosis when the sole aim of the procedure is that the resultant child is a compatible umbilical cord blood donor for a sick sibling.1 I agree with much of the argument to support this, however, I believe Spriggs has omitted one important point and underplayed another.The risk of PGD to the child born as a result of this process has not been fully studied. Therefore the parents are exposing the child to potential …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics briefings.Veronica English, Gillian Romano-Critchley, Julian Sheather & Ann Sommerville - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):384-385.
Preimplantation HLA typing: having children to save our loved ones.K. Devolder - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):582-586.
Jewish Perspectives on the Use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.Mark Popovsky - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):699-711.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
32 (#488,863)

6 months
13 (#275,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.Julian Savulescu - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Saviour siblings.M. Spriggs - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):289-289.

Add more references