Defense of Emergent Effects in Astrology Research: Rebuttal of Dean and Kelly (2023)

Journal of Scientific Exploration 37 (3):576-579 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article I wrote on the astrology research program (2022) has drawn criticism from G. Dean and I. Kelly (2023) that scarcely touches on my topics of effect sizes in single-factor, multi-factor, and automated whole-chart experimentation. They ignore the meta-analysis of current research and my explanation of emergent effects. Instead they try to impugn all of astrology by arguments that date from the time of Cicero and Augustine.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-22

Downloads
171 (#117,312)

6 months
129 (#33,254)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Appraisal of Shawn Carlson’s Renowned Astrology Tests.Suitbert Ertel - 2010 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 23 (2).

Add more references