Moral Absolutes and Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism

In Herbert De Vriese & Michiel Meijer (eds.), The Philosophy of Reenchantment. Routledge (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Elizabeth Anscombe makes a “disenchanting” move: she suggests that secular philosophers abandon a special “moral” sense of “ought” since she thinks this no longer makes sense without a divine law framework. Instead, she recommends recovering an ordinary sense of ought that pertains to what a human being needs in order to flourish qua human being, where the virtues are thought to be central to what a human being needs. However, she is also concerned to critique consequentialist views for their rejection of absolute prohibitions. This raises the question of whether the disenchanted form of Aristotelian ethical naturalism that she recommends to secular philosophers can support such absolute prohibitions. Anscombe expresses skepticism on this point and seems ultimately to recommend a divine law ethic, at least as a supplement to a neo-Aristotelian virtue ethic. This chapter takes issue with Anscombe’s view, in part: the author agrees that the disenchanted form of Aristotelian virtue ethics cannot support absolute prohibitions, but disagrees that appeal to divine law is the best way to understand these prohibitions since it misses the intrinsic reasons for them: namely, they concern that which is sacred or reverence-worthy and thus should be regarded as inviolable and as involving a “special moral ought.” This means that a neo-Aristotelian virtue ethic that can properly recognize moral absolutes will need a reenchanting move: namely, it needs to recognize the special normative demands of the sacred. This chapter also explores the question of what “moral ontology” can best make sense of the moral phenomenology of the sacred, but the main aim is to show the significance of a common anti-consequentialist form of moral perception that involves a sense of the sacred.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Aristotelian Naturalism.Irene Liu - 2018 - Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (3):269-286.
To What Extent Must We Go Beyond Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism?David McPherson - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):627-654.
Human Nature and Moral Sprouts: Mencius on the Pollyanna Problem.Richard T. Kim - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (1):140-162.
Moral Absolutes.Luke Robinson - 2022 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley.
Ethical Naturalism.James Andrew Ryan - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Why naturalism?David Copp - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Realist Ethical Naturalism for Ethical Non-Naturalists.Ryan Stringer - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (2):339-362.
Evolutionary Ethics.Michael Klenk - 2019 - Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics.
Realism, Naturalism, and Moral Semantics.David O. Brink - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):154.
Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates.Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ethical Naturalism and the Modern World-View. [REVIEW]E. M. J. - 1961 - Review of Metaphysics 14 (3):566-566.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-02

Downloads
596 (#28,015)

6 months
133 (#23,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David McPherson
University of Florida

Citations of this work

Aristotle for the Modern Ethicist.Sophia Connell - 2019 - Ancient Philosophy Today 1 (2):192-214.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - In Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the Good Life. Oup Usa.
The Importance of Being Human.Cora Diamond - 1991 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 29:35-62.
Ethics and Ontology.Charles Taylor - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (6):305-320.

View all 12 references / Add more references