1 patterns in the history of ideas


There is a general presumption that the law should be congruent with morality – that is, that the prohibitions and permissions in the law should correspond to the prohibitions and permissions of morality. And indeed in most areas of domestic law, and perhaps especially in the criminal law, the elements of the law do in general derive more or less directly from the requirements of morality. I will argue in this essay, however, that this correspondence with morality does not and at present cannot hold in the case of the international law of war. For various reasons, largely pragmatic in nature, the law of war must be substantially divergent from the morality of war.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,378

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

About morality and the nature of law.Joseph Raz - 2003 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (1):1-15.
The Laws of War.Jeff McMahan - 2010 - In Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Killing in war: A reply to Walzer.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):47-51.
Law and Morality.Leon Petraå¼Ycki - 1955 - Translation Publishers.
Legislative duty and the independence of law.J. H. Bogart - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.
The morality of war and the law of war.Jeff McMahan - 2008 - In David Rodin & Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford University Press. pp. 19--43.


Added to PP

12 (#917,191)

6 months

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeff McMahan
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references