A monochrome view of colour

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):204-204 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Saunders & van Brakel's criticism of Berlin & Kay's methodology misunderstands the fact that scientific hypotheses are tested by generating new, replicable data with novel explanatory power. Thus, although Berlin and Kay studied differences in colour words between languages, the same patterns are also present in colour word usage within languages, in a range of literary and other textual databases

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The irrelevance of the psychophysical argument.Carl Simpson - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):207-207.
Colour: An exosomatic organ?B. A. C. Saunders & J. van Brakel - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):212-220.
“Universals of colour” from a linguistic point of view.Anna Wierzbicka - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):724-725.
Semantics versus pragmatics in colour categorization.Nick Braisby & Bradley Franks - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):181-182.
“Colour science” and the autonomy of colour.Alan Costall - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):185-185.
Culture, Language and Thought: Field Studies on Colour Concepts.Arnold Groh - 2016 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 16 (1-2):83–106.
Colour-cognition is more universal than colour-language.I. R. L. Davies - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):186-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#569,108)

6 months
16 (#172,129)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references