The Sensation/Perception Distinction in Reid and Schopenhauer

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 16 (2):147-161 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What could Arthur Schopenhauer, the German pessimist and speculative metaphysician of the irrational will, possibly have in common with Thomas Reid, the staid and pious apostle of common sense? Unlike their contemporaries, both philosophers distinguished carefully between sensation and perception. In this essay I examine their respective formulations of the sensation / perception distinction, and I attempt to explain where they agree and where they diverge. Such an examination seems long overdue, for no-one – to the best of my knowledge – has bothered to compare their views on this subject.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The function of sensations in Reid.Todd Buras - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 329-353.
Reid, Hardness and Developmental Psychology.Adam Gur Arye - 2014 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 12 (2):145-162.
Reid, Hardness and Developmental Psychology.Adam Weiler Gur Arye - 2014 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 12 (2):145-162.
Thomas Reid on acquired perception.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):285-312.
The Passivity Assumption of the Sensation—Perception Distinction.Aaron Ben-Zeev - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (December):327-343.
Is Thomas Reid a Direct Realist about Perception?Hagit Benbaji - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):1-29.
Problems from Reid.James Van Cleve - 2015 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Was Reid a Direct Realist?Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):302 - 323.
Burge on perception and sensation.Lauren Olin - 2016 - Synthese 193 (5):1479-1508.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-09

Downloads
32 (#495,286)

6 months
11 (#230,695)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas McDermid
Trent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Prolegomena to any future metaphysics.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy (16):507-508.
Schopenhauer.Patrick Gardiner, Arthur Schopenhauer & E. Payne - 1966 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 22 (2):212-212.

View all 20 references / Add more references