A trinitarian grammar of sin

Modern Theology 27 (1):55-71 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay offers a critical reading of David Kelsey's hamartiology in Eccentric Existence. I elucidate Kelsey's “trinitarian grammar of sin,” which charts how human lives characteristically “miss the mark” of God's creating, consummating, and reconciling ways of relating to us. Kelsey uses this dynamic pattern of divine relating to illuminate the appropriate responses of the Christian life—faith, hope, and love—and their fundamental distortions. I commend three major contributions of Kelsey's hamartiology: his parsing of the relationship between sin and moral evil, his overturning of modernity's anthropocentric paradigm of sin, and his reconstruction of original sin. I conclude with three clusters of questions relating to: first, Kelsey's root paradigm of sin as idolatry, second, his use of impurity and stain language to describe original sin, and third, what is at stake in crafting theological anthropology in the analytical style of Eccentric Existence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Buoys for eccentric existence.James J. Buckley - 2011 - Modern Theology 27 (1):14-25.
A Trinitarian Grammar of Sin.J. O. Y. Mcdougall - 2011 - Modern Theology 27 (1):55-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
17 (#862,032)

6 months
1 (#1,470,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Radical Romanticism: postmodern polytheism in Richard Rorty and John Milbank.Henk-Jan Prosman - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 81 (1):18-35.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references