Dissertation, Stanford University (2006)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
A revisionist account of how philosophical induction was conceived in the ancient world and how that conception was transmitted, altered, and then rediscovered. I show how philosophers of late antiquity and then the medieval period came step-by-step to seriously misunderstand Aristotle’s view of induction and how that mistake was reversed by humanists in the Renaissance and then especially by Francis Bacon. I show, naturally enough then, that in early modern science, Baconians were Aristotelians and Aristotelians were Baconians.
|
Keywords | Induction Francis Bacon |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Some Historical Remarks on the Baconian Conception of Probability.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1980 - Journal of the History of Ideas 41 (2):219.
Epistemology of the Sciences.Nicholas Jardine - 1988 - In Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner & Eckhard Kessler (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 685--711.
Aristoteles latinus.Bernard G. Dod - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 45--79.
Induction Before Hume.J. R. Milton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):49-74.
View all 36 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Sources of Mill’s View of Ratiocination and Induction.Steffen Ducheyne & John P. McCaskey - 2014 - In Mill’s A System of Logic: Critical Appraisals. Rutledge.
Francis Bacon, Jan Baptist van Helmont Ve Rasyonel Yöntemin Sonucu Olarak Ilk Hareket Ettirici.Ünsal Çimen - 2018 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 11 (1).
Similar books and articles
Induction, Philosophical Conceptions Of.John P. McCaskey - 2020 - In Marco Sgarbi (ed.), Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer.
Induction in the Socratic Tradition.John P. McCaskey - 2014 - In Louis F. Groarke & Paolo C. Biondi (eds.), Shifting the Paradigm: Alternative Perspectives on Induction. De Gruyter. pp. 161-192.
Why Bacon’s Method is Not Certain.Robert Lane - 1999 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (2):181 - 192.
Crucial Instances and Francis Bacon’s Quest for Certainty.Schwartz Daniel - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1):130-150.
Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosophy (Review).Alan Stewart - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (4):542-543.
Francis Bacon, Early Modern Baconians and the Idols of Baconian Scholarship: Introductory Study.Dana Jalobeanu - 2013 - Society and Politics 7 (2013).
„Ars inveniendi” bij Francis Bacon.C. A. Van Peursen - 1989 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 51 (3):486-516.
On the True Method of Induction or Investigative Induction: Real but Invisible.Jagdish Hattiangadi - unknown
L'induction des Notions Chez Francis Bacon in Bacon.M. Malherbe - 1986 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 40 (159):427-445.
Reviving Material Theories of Induction.John P. McCaskey - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 83:1–7.
Semeiotic Logic or, Deduction, Induction, and Semeiotic.Ru Michael Sabre - 2018 - Semiotica 2018 (222):81-85.
Freeing Aristotelian Epagōgē From “Prior Analytics” II 23.John P. McCaskey - 2007 - Apeiron 40 (4):345-374.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-07-12
Total views
99 ( #116,712 of 2,499,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #44,617 of 2,499,037 )
2020-07-12
Total views
99 ( #116,712 of 2,499,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #44,617 of 2,499,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads