Formal Arguments in Support of the Coherence Theory of the Nature of Truth

Dialogue 4 (3):376-380 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Formal models of coherence and legal epistemology.Amalia Amaya - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (4):429-447.
A mistake in dynamic coherence arguments?Brian Skyrms - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):320-328.
How Does Coherence Matter?Niko Kolodny - 2007 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):229 - 263.
Argumentation Without Arguments.Henry Prakken - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):171-184.
A Graded Bayesian Coherence Notion.Frederik Herzberg - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (4):843-869.
Are moral philosophers moral experts?Bernward Gesang - 2008 - Bioethics 24 (4):153-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
5 (#1,546,014)

6 months
4 (#798,692)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematical Logic.Morton G. White & Willard Van Orman Quine - 1942 - Philosophical Review 51 (1):74.

Add more references