Assessing Competency Without Judging Merit

Journal of Clinical Ethics 9 (3):247-257 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/jce199809304

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Merit: The History of a Founding Ideal From the American Revolution to the Twenty-First Century.Joseph F. Kett - 2012 - Cornell University Press.
Judging Merit.Warren Thorngate - 2009 - Psychology Press. Edited by Robyn H. Dawes & Margaret Foddy.
The goals and merits of a business ethics competency exam.Earl W. Spurgin - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):279-288.
'Otherness' on the bench: How merit is gendered.Margaret Thornton - manuscript
The notion of merit in indian religions.Tommi Lehtonen - 2000 - Asian Philosophy 10 (3):189 – 204.
Judging the Ethical Merit of Clinical Trials: What Criteria Do Research Ethics Board Members Use?Eric M. Meslin, James V. Lavery, Heather J. Sutherland & James E. Till - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (4):6.
Measuring merit in animal research.Rebecca Dresser - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1).
Can't One Truly Judge that One is Judging?Daniel Dohrn - manuscript
Competency.Indoo Pandey Khanduri - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:123-131.
Judging as a non-voluntary action.Conor McHugh - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (2):245 - 269.
Evaluating Medico-Legal Decisional Competency Criteria.Demian Whiting - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (2):181-196.
Part 2.4: Autonomy competency.Diana Tietjens Meyers - unknown
Animal Experimentation in Psychology and the Question of Scientific Merit.Denise Russell - 1997 - Ethics and the Environment 2 (1):43 - 52.
Assessing the Science -- Society Relation: The Case of the U.S. National Science Foundation's Second Merit Review Criterion.J. Britt Holbrook - 2005 - Technology in Society 27 (4):437--451.
Infallibilism about Self-Knowledge II: Lagadonian Judging.T. Parent - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
9 (#1,236,107)

6 months
7 (#417,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reassessing the Reliability of Advance Directives.Thomas May - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):325.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references