Health Care Analysis 23 (2):181-196 (2015)

Demian Whiting
University of Hull
In this paper I get clearer on the considerations that ought to inform the evaluation and development of medico-legal competency criteria—where this is taken to be a question regarding the abilities that ought to be needed for a patient to be found competent in medico-legal contexts. In the “Decisional Competency in Medico-Legal Contexts” section I explore how the question regarding the abilities that ought to be needed for decisional competence is to be interpreted. I begin by considering an interpretation that takes the question to be asking about the abilities needed to satisfy an idealized view of competent decision-making, according to which decisional competency is a matter of possessing those abilities or attributes that are needed to engage in good or effective or, perhaps, substantially autonomous or rational decision-making. The view has some plausibility—it accords with the way decisional competency is understood in a number of everyday contexts—but fails as an interpretation of the question regarding the abilities that should be needed for decisional competence in medico-legal contexts. Nevertheless, consideration of why it is mistaken suggests a more accurate interpretation and points the way in which the question regarding the evaluation of medico-legal competency criteria is to be answered. Building on other scholarly work in the area, I outline in the “Primary and Secondary Requirements” section several requirements that decisional competence criteria ought to satisfy. Then, in the “Applying the Framework” section, I say something about the extent to which medico-legal competency criteria, as well as some models of decisional competency proposed in the academic literature, fulfil those requirements
Keywords Decisional authority  Decisional competency  Idealized views of competency  Law  Medico-legal contexts  Proportionality  Necessity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10728-013-0258-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Decision-Making Capacity.Louis Charland - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Decision-Making Capacity.Jennifer Hawkins & Louis C. Charland - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Decision-Making Capacity.Louis Charland - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Competency: The Only Criteria of Applied Knowledge.Indoo Pandey Khanduri - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:123-131.
On Risk and Decisional Capacity.David Checkland - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):35 – 59.
The Goals and Merits of a Business Ethics Competency Exam.Earl W. Spurgin - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):279-288.
Equality and Democracy.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Ethical Perspectives 14 (1):3-12.


Added to PP index

Total views
66 ( #173,608 of 2,506,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes