'Otherness' on the bench: How merit is gendered

Abstract

This paper focuses on the construction of merit as the key selection criterion for judging. It will show how merit has been masculinised within the social script so as to militate against the acceptance of women as judges. The social construction of the feminine in terms of disorder in the public sphere fans doubts that women are appointable - certainly not in significant numbers to the most senior levels of the bench. It is argued that merit, far from being an objective criterion, operates as a rhetorical device shaped by power. The paper will draw on media representations of women judges in three recent Australian scenarios: an appointment to the High Court; the appointment of almost 50 percent women to Victorian benches; and the scapegoating of a female chief magistrate (resulting in imprisonment) in Queensland.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The notion of merit in indian religions.Tommi Lehtonen - 2000 - Asian Philosophy 10 (3):189 – 204.
Measuring merit in animal research.Rebecca Dresser - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1).
Judging Merit.Warren Thorngate - 2009 - Psychology Press. Edited by Robyn H. Dawes & Margaret Foddy.
The Concept of Merit Good in Economic Theory.Wilfried Ver Eecke - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:181-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
6 (#1,269,929)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Editorial Introduction: Women and Judging. [REVIEW]Dermot Feenan - 2009 - Feminist Legal Studies 17 (1):1-9.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references