How to conceive of critical educational theory today?

Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3):351–367 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper starts from a brief sketch of the ‘classical’ figure of critical educational theory or science (Kritische Erziehungswissenshaft). ‘Critical educational theory’ presents itself as the privileged guardian of the critical principle of education (Bildung) and its emancipatory promise. It involves the possibility of saying ‘I’ in order to speak and think in one's own name, to be critical, self-reflective and independent, to determine dependence from the present power relations and existing social order. Actual social and educational reality and relations are approached as a limitation, threat, alienation, re/oppression or negation of ultimate human principles or potential. The task of critical educational theory becomes one of enabling an autonomous, critical, self-reflective life. While ‘critique’ and ‘autonomy’ have meanwhile become commonplace, and ‘critique’ and ‘autonomy’ are reclaimed and required from everybody, we should also consider the question of the relation between an institutional or ideological framework as that which claims to question this frame and to constitute its opposite. The trivialisation of critique is taken as occasion to recall Michel Foucault's analysis of power relations and especially his thesis according to which the ‘government of individualisation’ is the actual figure of power. Starting from the framework offered by Foucault, it can be made clear that the autonomous, critical, self-reflective life does not represent an ultimate principle but refers to a very specific form of subjectification operating as a transmission belt for power. The autonomous, critical, self-reflective person appears as an historical model of self-conduct whereby power operates precisely through the intensification of reflectiveness and critique rather than through their repression, alienation or negation. This brings us back then to the question of how to conceive of the task of a critical educational theory at a time in which critique, autonomy and self-determination have become an essential modus operandi of the existing order.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to Conceive of Critical Educational Theory Today?Jan Masschelein - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3):351-367.
Liberating the Critical in Critical Theory Transcending Marcuse on Alienation, Art and the Humanities.Charles Reitz - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 29:266-273.
The power of power—questions to Michel Foucault.Norbert Ricken - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):541–560.
The Power of Power—Questions to Michel Foucault.Norbert Ricken - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):541-560.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#121,482)

6 months
11 (#1,140,922)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Knowledge and human interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1971 - London [etc.]: Heinemann Educational.
The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.J. F. Lyotard - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:520.
The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.Jean-Francois Lyotard - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:520.
Politics, philosophy, culture: interviews and other writings, 1977-1984.Michel Foucault - 1988 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Lawrence D. Kritzman.

View all 23 references / Add more references