The Strategy of Philip in 346 B.C

Classical Quarterly 24 (02):253- (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relatively plentiful sources for the year 346 pose several questions which have never been satisfactorily answered. Why did Philip insist on an alliance with Athens as a precondition of the peace ? Did Demosthenes simply invent the promises of Philip which he claims Aeschines reported to the Athenian assembly in Skirophorion? Why were the Athenians frightened when Philip got control of Thermopylae? They had long expected him to settle the Sacred War, and such action surely required occupation of the pass. The correct answer to these questions indicates that Philip had two alternative plans in 346. ‘Plan A’ was with the aid of the Athenians to turn on Thebes. By this move, he would reduce the power of the second greatest city in Greece and thus eliminate the possibility of a combination of Athens and Thebes, which might be sufficiently powerful to block his ambitions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philip's actions in 347 and early 346 b.c.N. G. L. Hammond - 1994 - Classical Quarterly 44 (02):367-.
Real realism: The galilean strategy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (2):151-197.
Two Anti-Platonist Strategies.Chris Daly & Simon Langford - 2010 - Mind 119 (476):1107-1116.
Corporate strategy and ethics.Daniel R. Gilbert - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (2):137 - 150.
Is There a Right of National Defense?Thomas Peard - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:341-347.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
24 (#646,208)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references