The role of metaethics and the future of computer ethics

Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):71-78 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In the following essay, I will discuss D.Johnson's argument in her ETHICOMP99 KeynoteSpeech (Johnson 1999) regarding the possiblefuture disappearance of computer ethics as anautonomous discipline, and I will analyze somelikely objections to Johnson's view.In the future, there are two ways in whichcomputer ethics might disappear: (1) therejection of computer ethics as an aspect ofapplied ethics, or (2) the rejection ofcomputer ethics as an autonomous discipline.The first path, it seems to me, would lead tothe death of the entire field of appliedethics, while the second path would lead onlyto the death of computer ethics as a separatesubject. Computer technology is becoming very pervasive,and each scientific field includes somediscipline-specific computing. For the likelyforeseeable future, disciplines such asbioethics and engineering ethics will have todeal with ethical issues involving the role ofcomputers. I will argue that computer ethics inthis sense is unlikely to disappear, even ifcomputer ethics ceases to be considered as aseparate discipline.In order to understand which path will befollowed by computer ethics, I will compareJohnson's argument with ideas of earlierthinkers like N. Wiener (1950) and B. Russell(1932). Although Russell did not specificallyconsider computer technology, he had somegood intuitions about the development ofsocieties by means of technology.My conclusion will be two-fold: (1) thatapplied ethics will not die, but it may make nosense in the future to talk about computerethics as a separate field; and (2) thatcomputer ethics will not simply become``ordinary ethics'', contrary to Johnson's view.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Computer ethics: Its birth and its future.Terrell Ward Bynum - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):109-112.
Computer ethics: Its birth and its future. [REVIEW]TerrellWard Bynum - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):109-112.
Computer Ethics as a Field of Applied Ethics.Herman T. Tavani - 2012 - Journal of Information Ethics 21 (2):52-70.
Unique ethical problems in information technology.Professor Walter Maner - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):137-154.
Unique ethical problems in information technology.Walter Maner - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):137-154.
Computer Ethics.Deborah G. Johnson - 2004 - In Luciano Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 63–75.


Added to PP

75 (#225,994)

6 months
6 (#588,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Does computing need to go beyond good and evil impacts?Randy Connolly & Alan Fedoruk - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):190-204.
The future of computer ethics 12 years after: in memory of Alessandro D'Atri.Antonio Marturano - 2012 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 10 (3):124-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Information ethics: on the philosophical foundation of computer ethics.Luciano Floridi - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):33–52.
The Human Use of Human Beings.Norbert Wiener - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (9):91-92.
An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis.John Hospers - 1956 - Philosophy 33 (124):70-71.

View all 12 references / Add more references