Raz’s appeal to law’s authority

Philosophical Studies 181 (1):267-280 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Joseph Raz’s _Argument from Authority_ is one of the most famous defences of exclusive positivism in jurisprudence, the position that the existence and content of the law in a society is a wholly social fact, which can be established without the need to engage in moral analysis. According to Raz’s argument, legal systems are _de facto_ practical authorities that, like all _de facto_ authorities, must claim _legitimate_ authority, which itself entails that they must be _capable_ of being an authority. Further, once we properly understand what constitutes practical authority, as captured by Raz’s _service conception_, we realise that the directives of any authority (including the law) must be wholly identifiable without recourse to moral analysis. While the argument has previously been criticised on the grounds that the law does not claim legitimate authority, and further that the service conception of authority itself is inadequate, we argue here that the argument is actually in a worse position than these concerns recognise, for it relies upon the mistaken principle that a sincere belief or claim that _p_ guarantees _p_’s conceptual possibility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,141

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Scope of the Participant’s Perspective in Joseph Raz’s Theory of Law.Paula Gaido - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 25 (2):347-357.
The Relational Conception of Practical Authority.N. P. Adams - 2018 - Law and Philosophy 37 (5):549-575.
Unresolved Problems in the Service Conception of Authority.James Sherman - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (3):419-440.
Against Deference to Authority.Travis Quigley - 2023 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 26 (1).
The Authority of Law in the Circumstances of Politics.Mark Capustin - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2):297-321.
Authority, Accountability, and Preemption.Stephen Darwall - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):103-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-21

Downloads
40 (#572,768)

6 months
9 (#525,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Martin
University of Padua

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Individualism and the mental.Tyler Burge - 1979 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):73-122.
Authority, Law and Morality.Joseph Raz - 1985 - The Monist 68 (3):295-324.
The Authority of Law.Alan R. White & J. Raz - 1980 - Philosophical Quarterly 30 (120):278.
Paraconsistent logics?B. H. Slater - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (4):451 - 454.

View all 12 references / Add more references