On the logic of contingent relevant implication: a conceptual incoherence in the intuitive interpretation of ${\rm R}$

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (4):520-529 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On an implication connective of RM.Arnon Avron - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):201-209.
A note on ${\rm R}_{\rightarrow}$ matrices.Robert K. Meyer - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):450-472.
The admissibility of $\gamma$ in ${\rm R}4$.Edwin D. Mares & Robert K. Meyer - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (2):197-206.
Anderson's deontic logic and relevant implication.Robert P. McArthur - 1981 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):145-154.
Reduced models for relevant logics without ${\rm WI}$.John K. Slaney - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (3):395-407.
Real reduced models for relevant logics without ${\rm WI}$.Steve Giambrone - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (3):442-449.
An intuitive interpretation of systems of four-valued logic.Nicholas Rescher - 1965 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 6 (2):154-156.
${\rm E}$ and ${\rm S}4$.Robert K. Meyer - 1970 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 11 (2):181-199.
${\rm S}3.02={\rm S}3.03$.George F. Schumm - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):147-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
20 (#793,209)

6 months
41 (#98,786)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Lance
Georgetown University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references