Eukaryotes first: how could that be? [Book Review]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370:1-10 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the half century since the formulation of the prokaryote : eukaryote dichotomy, many authors have proposed that the former evolved from something resembling the latter, in defiance of common (and possibly common sense) views. In such ‘eukaryotes first’ (EF) scenarios, the last universal common ancestor is imagined to have possessed significantly many of the complex characteristics of contemporary eukaryotes, as relics of an earlier ‘progenotic’ period or RNAworld. Bacteria and Archaea thus must have lost these complex features secondarily, through ‘streamlining’. If the canonical three-domain tree in which Archaea and Eukarya are sisters is accepted, EF entails that Bacteria and Archaea are convergently prokaryotic.We ask what this means and how it might be tested.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Too Much Eukaryote LGT.William F. Martin - 2017 - Bioessays 39 (12):1700115.
How Did the Eukaryotes Evolve?Marcello Barbieri - 2017 - Biological Theory 12 (1):13-26.
Eukaryogenesis: how special, really?Austin Booth & W. Ford Doolittle - 2015 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America:1-8.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-15

Downloads
221 (#90,919)

6 months
78 (#60,936)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Carlos Mariscal de Gante
National Autonomous University of Mexico (PhD)
Carlos Mariscal
University of Nevada, Reno
W. Doolittle
Dalhousie University