Back to the science of life

Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):129-146 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We give a survey of epistemological and ontological approaches that have left traces in the 20th-century biology. A common motive of most of them is the effort to incorporate biology into the realm of physical sciences. However, such attempts failed, and must fail in the future, unless the criterion for what science is becomes biologically oriented. This means broadening the realm of classical natural sciences, incorporating at least part of the thesaurus of the “humanities”. We suggest three mutually complementary candidates for further development in this direction: modular biology, the hermeneutics of the living, and the semiotic disciplines.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Conception of Life in Synthetic Biology.Anna Https://Orcidorg Deplazes-Zemp - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):757-774.
Biology and epistemology.Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Instrumental Biology, or the Disunity of Science.Alexander Rosenberg - 1994 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
21 (#734,423)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Short History of Biosemiotics.Marcello Barbieri - 2009 - Biosemiotics 2 (2):221-245.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references