An Ethical Interpretation of the Nash Choice Rule

Theory and Decision 49 (2):151-157 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides an ethical intepretation of the Nash choice rule. In a setting in which (cardinal) utilities are interpersonally comparable, this procedure is characterised by an impartiality requirement and by the assumption that choices are not responsive to the agents' relative ability to convert resources into utility

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A stocktaking of perversities.Anthony de Jasay - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (4):537-544.
Dynamic Choice Mechanisms.Ludwig von Auer - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (3):295-312.
Ethical Choice.Ronald M. Roman - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:26-30.
Choices, consequences, and rationality.Walter Bossert - 2001 - Synthese 129 (3):343 - 369.
Correlated strategies as Institutions.Daniel G. M. Arce - 1997 - Theory and Decision 42 (3):271-285.
Neural networks for selection and the Luce choice rule.Claus Bundesen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):471-472.
Taking the Self out of Self-Rule.Michael Garnett - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):21-33.
The Problem with Rescue Medicine.N. S. Jecker - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):64-81.
Ethical Consumers’ Brand Choice on Technology-Based Products.Kumju Hwang, William Young, Seonaidh McDonald & Caroline Oates - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:314-319.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
49 (#323,022)

6 months
6 (#507,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Some formal models of grading principles.Patrick Suppes - 1966 - Synthese 16 (3-4):284 - 306.
Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made.Peter J. Hammond - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press. pp. 200--254.

Add more references