Choices, consequences, and rationality

Synthese 129 (3):343 - 369 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A generalized theory of revealed preference is formulated for choice situations where the consequences of choices from given menus are uncertain. In a nonprobabilistic framework, rational choice behavior can be defined by requiring the existence of a preference relation on the set of possible consequences and an extension rule for this relation to the power set of the set of consequences such that the chosen sets of possible outcomes are the best elements in the feasible set according to this extension rule. Rational choice is characterized under various assumptions on these relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Experimental Tests of Rationality.Daniel Read - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prasanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press.
Notes and Comments.Brian Mcneil - 1938 - New Scholasticism 12 (2):197-198.
A Theory of Rational Choice under Ignorance.Klaus Nehring - 2000 - Theory and Decision 48 (3):205-240.
Rational choice and agm belief revision.Giacomo Bonanno - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (12-13):1194-1203.
Choices, consequences and desert.Teun J. Dekker - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):109 – 126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#295,072)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Internal consistency of choice.Amartya Sen - 1993 - Econometrica 61:495–521.
Rationality and uncertainty.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Theory and Decision 18 (2):109-127.

Add more references