A one-person doxastic characterization of Nash strategies

Synthese 158 (2):251-271 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Within a formal epistemic model for simultaneous-move games, we present the following conditions: belief in the opponents’ rationality, stating that a player believes that every opponent chooses an optimal strategy, self-referential beliefs, stating that a player believes that his opponents hold correct beliefs about his own beliefs, projective beliefs, stating that i believes that j’s belief about k’s choice is the same as i’s belief about k’s choice, and conditionally independent beliefs, stating that a player believes that opponents’ types choose their strategies independently. We show that, if a player satisfies BOR, SRB and CIB, and believes that every opponent satisfies BOR, SRB, PB and CIB, then he will choose a Nash strategy. We thus provide a sufficient collection of one-person conditions for Nash strategy choice. We also show that none of these seven conditions can be dropped

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#167,667)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrés Perea
Maastricht University

Citations of this work

Frames, reasoning, and the emergence of conventions.Nicola Campigotto - 2020 - Economics and Philosophy 36 (3):383-400.
Correlated-belief equilibrium.Elias Tsakas - 2016 - Synthese 193 (3):757-779.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references