Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):75 - 107 (1999)
AbstractThe publication of Political Liberalismhas allowed John Rawls to bring to the fore issues that remained in the background of A Theory of Justice. His explicit attention to the concept of ‘the reasonable’ is a welcome development. In a more recent publication, he affirms the importance of this concept, ‘while [granting] that the idea of the reasonable needs a more thorough examination than Political Liberalism offers.’ In this paper, I will present a critical exposition of the senses of the reasonable on which justice as fairness relies. Rawls employs the term in four main contexts. I will outline these various senses and argue that in each case, a controversy in the secondary literature can be resolved by close attention to the concept of the reasonable. In three of these contexts, Rawls relies on what I will call a ‘strong’ sense of the reasonable, while in one he sometimes seems to rely on a ‘weak’ sense. I argue that justice as fairness is best served by relying on a strong sense throughout.
Similar books and articles
Overlapping Consensus: Objectivizing a Subjective Standpoint.Remi Odedoyin - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:323-343.
Justice as Fairness: Luck Egalitarian, Not Rawlsian.Michael Otsuka - 2010 - The Journal of Ethics 14 (3-4):217-230.
John Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2001, pp. xviii + 214.Jon Mandle - 2002 - Utilitas 14 (2):265.
Jon Mandle, What's Left of Liberalism: An Interpretation and Defense of Justice as Fairness, Lanham MD, Lexington Books, 2000, pp. xi + 323.Samuel Freeman - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (3):382.
Being reasonable in the face of pluralism and other alleged problems for Global Justice: a reply to van Hooft.Gillian Brock - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (2):155-170.
Fairness and the main management theories of the twentieth century: A historical review, 1900–1965.Harry J. Van Buren - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):633-644.
Fairness and the Main Management Theories of the Twentieth Century: A Historical Review, 1900–1965.Harry J. Van Buren - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):633 - 644.
The Impossibility of Democracy: Rawls’s and Rousseau’s Unacknowledged Demand for Irony.James Hersh - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:243-249.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Respecting Human Dignity: Contract versus Capabilities.Cynthia A. Stark - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):366-381.
Patterns of Justification: On Political Liberalism and the Primacy of Public Justification.Thomas M. Besch - 2022 - Journal of Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):47-63.
The (Un)Reasonableness of Rawlsian Rationality.Shaun Young - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):308-20.
References found in this work
Contractualism and utilitarianism.Thomas M. Scanlon - 1982 - In Amartya Kumar Sen & Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. pp. 103--128.