Anthropological project as a basis of cartesian Eth-ics

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 11:117-126 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to determine and understand the conditions of the anthropological project development by Descartes. It implies the necessity to conceive its entrenched forms in scientific revolution, which leads to a) a human as an embodiment of some abstract mind, b) its transcendence, as well as the possibility to penetrate into a human nature in the course of ethics development. Originality. According to the author, the anthropological interpretation of Descartes is not profound, since a human is taken as embodiment of abstract mind, and ethics is a set of some simple rules. The impact of scientific revolution, which was not well perceived, leads to the domination of a restricted understanding of a human in research literature. The author insists on taking into account the fact that Descartes was beyond epistemology due to the topical issue concerning a proper mode of life. Conclusions. The incomprehensive interpretation of the attitude of Descartes to scientific revolution causes restricted understanding a human nature as abstract mind embodiment and ethics as a set of simple rules. Thorough analysis of the thinker's texts proves his profound interpretation of scientific revolution impact and integrated vision of a human nature, as well as significant development of ethical issues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anthropological component of descartes’ ontology.Anatolii M. Malivskyi - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 5:109-119.
Science and Theology in Descartes' "Meditations on First Philosophy".Peter E. Vedder - 1999 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America
Descartes’ Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
Heidegger about the anthropological intention of descartes` philosophizing.Anatolii M. Malivskyi - 2013 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 3:14-22.
Descartes' Philosophy of Science.Desmond M. Clarke - 1982 - Manchester: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Descartes.John Cottingham (ed.) - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Limits of Cartesian Doubt.Eric Palmer - 1997 - Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4:1-20.
Stretching the In-between: Embodiment and Beyond. [REVIEW]Don Ihde - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2-3):109-118.
The anthropological tradition in the philosophy of medicine.Henk Ten Have - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-10

Downloads
13 (#1,017,336)

6 months
5 (#633,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Doctrine of man in Descartes and Pascal.A. M. Malivskyi - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 16:133-142.
Descartes about anthropological grounds of philosophy in the "early writings".А. М Маlivskyi - 2018 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 14:132-141.
Рersonal philosophizing motives: Descartes and Kierkegaard.A. M. Malivskyi - 2018 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 13:124-133.
Searching for the true self: The way of nondual wisdom.T. V. Danylova - 2017 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 12:7-15.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Essays on Descartes.Paul Hoffman - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
The invention of nature: Descartes and Regius.Theo Verbeek - 2000 - In John Schuster, Stephen Gaukroger & John Sutton (eds.), Descartes' Natural Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 149--167.
Historical Dictionary of Descartes and Cartesian Philosophy.Roger Ariew, Dennis Des Chene, Douglas Michael Jesseph, Tad M. Schmaltz & Theo Verbeek - 2003 - Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. Edited by Dennis Des Chene, Douglas Michael Jesseph, Tad M. Schmaltz & Theo Verbeek.

View all 8 references / Add more references