Epistemic Inquiry into in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) vis-à-vis Thomas Aquinas’ Natural Law Theory: Comparative Analysis

Open Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):764-774 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work sought to carry out a comparative analysis of in vitro fertilization (IVF) vis-à-vis St. Thomas Aquinas’ Natural Law Theory. Both of them emanated from problem of infertility. IVF makes use of artificial insemination for fertilization which is quite contrary to the natural process of sexual reproduction. This work makes use of analytic method to analyse comparatively in vitro fertilization and St. Thomas Aquinas’ Natural Law Theory. Thus, this work conceives that IVF is one of the assisted reproductive technologies in the scientific exploration of genetic engineering and bio-technology which emanated to tackle the problem of genetic inheritance outside marriage. It contravenes the coital or natural reproduction which conforms to St. Thomas Aquinas’ second precept of natural law. Again, IVF is artificial as such it is pruned to many complications. There is no adequate information given by the medical practitioners or providers of this service on the health hazards or risks involve in IVF. In addition, in vitro fertilization makes provision for donor gamete and surrogate motherhood which may have many negative implications both for the couples, off-spring, gestation mother, and society at large.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-23

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fertilisation and moral status: a scientific perspective.K. Dawson - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (4):173-178.
Our right to in vitro fertilisation--its scope and limits.T. Tannsjo - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):802-806.

Add more references