Belief-In Revisited: A Reply To Williams: J. J. MACINTOSH

Religious Studies 30 (4):487-503 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ‘Belief-In and Belief in God’ , J. N. Williams suggests that belief in God cannot be rational unless one has rational beliefs that God exists. While agreeing with his conclusion , I disagree at almost every step with his method of arriving at it. In particular I suggest that Williams goes astray concerning the dual aspect of belief in , the nature of performatives, the arousal of belief states, and the correct account of belief in God

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Belief-in Revisited: A Reply to Williams.J. J. Macintosh - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):487 - 503.
Believing the self-contradictory.Fabien Schang - 2011 - In Dariusz Łukasiewicz & Roger Pouivet (eds.), The Right to Believe: Perspectives in Religious Epistemology. De Gruyter. pp. 127-140.
God, Hume and Natural Belief.J. C. A. Gaskin - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (189):281-294.
Belief-in and Belief in God.John N. Williams - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (3):401 - 406.
Belief-in and Belief in God.John N. Williams - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (3):401-405.
Faith and the Existence of God: Faith and Rationality.D. C. Barrett - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:135-143.
Faith and the Existence of God: Faith and Rationality.D. C. Barrett - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 24:135-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
25 (#654,840)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack MacIntosh
Last affiliation: University of Calgary

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references