Belief-in Revisited: A Reply to Williams

Religious Studies 30 (4):487 - 503 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 'Belief-In and Belief in God' ("Religious Studies", 28, 1992), J. N. Williams suggests that belief in God cannot be rational unless one has rational beliefs that God exists. While agreeing with his conclusion (though not with his statement of it), I disagree at almost every step with his method of arriving at it. In particular I suggest that Williams goes astray concerning the dual aspect of belief in, the nature of performatives, the arousal of belief states, and the correct account of belief in God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Belief-in and Belief in God.John N. Williams - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (3):401 - 406.
The whisper of spirit: a believable God today.Antony F. Campbell - 2008 - Grand Rapids, Mich.: W. B. Eerdmans.
Reasons and Religious Belief.Patrick Lee - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):19-34.
Is God's Belief Requirement Rational?Greg Janzen - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (4):465-478.
Epistemic Circularity and Common Sense: A Reply to Reed.Michael Bergmann - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198-207.
A middle way to God.Garth L. Hallett - 2000 - Karachi: Oxford University Press.
God and Goodness.Hugh Rice - 2000 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge, belief, and faith.Anthony Kenny - 2007 - Philosophy 82 (3):381-397.
Why believe?John Cottingham - 2009 - New York: Continuum.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
59 (#267,103)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack MacIntosh
Last affiliation: University of Calgary

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references