Artificial Means of Reproduction and Our Understanding of the Family

Hastings Center Report 21 (1):5-11 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The new reproductive technologies force us to rethink the concepts ‘mother,’ ‘father,’ ‘family.’ As we draw analogies to traditional patterns, we must distinguish between ethical and conceptual questions.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3563339

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2006 - The Monist 89 (4):548-566.
Family Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges.Carolyn McLeod & Francoise Baylis (eds.) - 2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Children's perspectives of the family: A phenomenological inquiry. [REVIEW]Roberta A. Davilla & Judy C. Pearson - 1994 - Human Studies 17 (3):325 - 341.
The Artificial Family: A Consideration of Artificial Insemination by Donor. By R. Snowden & G. D. Mitchell. Pp. 138. (Allen and Unwin, London, 1981.) £6.95. [REVIEW]Brendan Soane - 1982 - Journal of Biosocial Science 14 (1):125-126.
The philosophy of artificial life.Margaret A. Boden (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is the family to be abolished then?Véronique Munoz-Dardé - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):37–56.
Artificial reproduction technologies (RTs) – all the way to the artificial womb?Frida Simonstein - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (3):359-365.
Cloning, the family and adoption.Glenn McGee - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):47-54.
Biomedicine, the Family, and Human Rights.Marie Thérèse Meulders-Klein, Ruth Deech & Paul Vlaardingerbroek (eds.) - 2002 - Kluwer Law International.
Begetting, cloning and being human: Two national commission reports against human cloning from italy and the U.s.A.Matteo Galletti - 2006 - HEC Forum 18 (2):156-171.
The Moral Challenge of Natality: Towards a Post-traditional Concept of Family and Privacy in Reprogenetics.Claudia Wiesemann - 2010 - The New Genetics and Society 29:61-71.
Regulating autonomy: sex, reproduction and family.Shelley Day Sclater (ed.) - 2009 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
Reproduction, familiarity, love, and humaneness: How did confucius reveal “humaneness”? [REVIEW]Hongxing Chen - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):506-522.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
39 (#406,659)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Taking Families Seriously.James Lindemann Nelson - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (4):6-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Baby Broker Boom.George J. Annas - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (3):30-31.
Legislative Approaches to Surrogate Motherhood.R. Alta Charo - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):96-112.

Add more references