Sistemi Intelligenti 3 (31):601-632 (2019)

Fabrizio Macagno
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Twitter is an instrument used not only for sharing public or personal information, but also for persuading the audience. While specific platforms and software have been developed for analyzing macro-analytical data, and specific studies have focused on the linguistic dimension of the tweets, the argumentative dimension of the latter is unexplored to this date. This paper intends to propose a method grounded on the tools advanced in argumentation theory for capturing, coding, and assessing the different argumentative dimensions of the messages posted on Twitter, focusing on the types of argument communicated, the quality of their premises, and the fallacies committed – including the use of unshared presuppositions and emotive words. This method is applied to a corpus of 843 tweets published by the Italian Minister of the Interior, Mr. Matteo Salvini, from the date of his appointment to the beginning of his campaign for the European elections. The quantitative data provide general indications for detecting the strategies that characterize the argumentative profile of Salvini, which are then analyzed qualitatively.
Keywords Argomentazione   Parole emotive  Twitter   Fallacie  Presupposizione
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Emotive Language in Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Argumentation Profiles.Fabrizio Macagno - 2022 - Informal Logic 42 (1):83-138.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Saggi sull'argomentazione giuridica.Massimo Mancini (ed.) - 2017 - Turin, Italy: Giappichelli.
Note sul rapporto tra azioni, veritÀ e politica.Leonardo Caffo - 2012 - Società Degli Individui 44:145-150.
Social Media, Financial Algorithms and the Hack Crash.Tero Karppi & Kate Crawford - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (1):73-92.
Dimostrazione e argomentazione.Ch Perelman - 1956 - Rivista di Filosofia 47 (4):379.
Argomentazione e retorica in Perelman.V. Stella - 1963 - Giornale di Metafisica 18:165.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #554,756 of 2,498,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #42,647 of 2,498,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes