Is the sex of the knower epistemologically significant?

Metaphilosophy 12 (3-4):267-276 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex differences and neuroethics.Peggy DesAutels - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):95-111.
Operators in the paradox of the knower.Patrick Grim - 1993 - Synthese 94 (3):409 - 428.
Sex, gender, and science.Myra J. Hird - 2004 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
How should we teach sex?David Archard - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 32 (3):437–450.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
340 (#59,528)

6 months
16 (#157,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How is this Paper Philosophy?Kristie Dotson - 2012 - Comparative Philosophy 3 (1):3-29.
Epistemic Courage.Jonathan Ichikawa - 2024 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Machines and the Moral Community.Erica L. Neely - 2013 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (1):97-111.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references