How should we teach sex?

Journal of Philosophy of Education 32 (3):437–450 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the face of differences about how sex should be taught to young persons, and consistent with a liberal principle of neutrality, educationalists can adopt one of two strategies. The ‘retreat to basics’ consists in teaching only a basic agreed code of sexual conduct, or a set of agreed principles of sexual morality. The ‘conjunctive–disjunctive’ strategy consists in teaching the facts of sexual activity together with the various possible evaluations of these facts. Both strategies are beset with significant and insuperable difficulties. Perhaps one should presume only to teach sex in a way that maximises the foundational liberal ideal of autonomy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#57,000)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Archard
Lancaster University

Citations of this work

Mutuality in Sexual Relationships: a Standard of Ethical Sex?Sharon Lamb, Sam Gable & Doret de Ruyter - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):271-284.
What Should be the Moral Aims of Compulsory Sex Education?Jan Steutel & Doret J. de Ruyter - 2011 - British Journal of Educational Studies 59 (1):75-86.
Burke, Moral Realism, and the View From Within Practices.Paul Davis - 2003 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 30 (2):117-131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references