Conformity versus Nonconformity to Social Ethics

The Monist 58 (4):674-682 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The foremost task of educational philosophy is to deal with questions about the process of education and to formulate means and ends to the educational experience. In the development of such formulations, the educational philosopher must make extensive analyses of such relevant concepts and factors as democracy, intellectual freedom, individual experience, social control, and instructional method. This is particularly true in regard to the philosophy of social and ethical education. Two questions of social and ethical significance have, in particular, claimed the attention of educational philosophers. These are: what rules of conduct should be taught in the schools and how should these rules be taught? It is with these questions that the present writing essentially deals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Rules and Patterns of Behavior.David T. Ozar - 1977 - Philosophy Research Archives 3:879-895.
Corporate ethics initiatives as social control.William S. Laufer & Diana C. Robertson - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (10):1029-1047.
Philosophy, dissent, and nonconformity.Alan P. F. Sell - 2004 - Cambridge: James Clarke & Co..
Toward A Code of Ethics for Marketing Educators.M. Joseph Sirgy, J. S. Johar & Tao Gao - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 63 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
56 (#284,092)

6 months
1 (#1,463,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references