Whither philosophy of science?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):774-778 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A response to Philip Mirowski’s criticism of 20th century philosophy of science as in collusion with cold war US politics. Only a very narrow view of the work in our field could support such a critique.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Helen Longino.Philip Kitcher - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):569-572.
Reply to Philip Kitcher.Helen E. Longino - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):573-577.
Feminism and philosophy of science.Helen E. Longino - 1990 - Journal of Social Philosophy 21 (2-3):150-159.
Alan Sokal's “transgressing boundaries.Helen E. Longino - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):119 – 120.
Taking Gender Seriously in Philosophy of Science.Helen E. Longino - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:333 - 340.
Our world views (may be) incommensurable: Now what?Carol Bayley - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):271-284.
What Do We Measure When We Measure Aggression?Helen E. Longino - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):685-704.
Can There Be A Feminist Science?Helen E. Longino - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):51 - 64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
64 (#251,372)

6 months
6 (#509,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Longino
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science and the politics of Hunger.Mary Tiles - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):174.

Add more references